RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Islam and Sharia: Deadly Facts You Should Know

With the presidential race focused squarely on the economy, Islam and Sharia continues to furtively creep into every aspect of American culture. And too few people are talking about it. Why? Because Americans have been conditioned by the liberal elites to be tolerant and compassionate, to embrace multiculturalism and respect each other’s beliefs, ideals and values.

That’s wonderful in a utopian world, but the fact is, Islam doesn’t embrace any aspect of Western civilization—much less American culture.

We are rapidly and methodically being dismantled as a nation, and our freedom and liberty is more fragile than at anytime since WWII. And while we fight the enemy abroad with combat troops, intelligence and drone strikes, we’re doing nothing to combat the same exact enemy that resides on our own soil in broad daylight. If we don’t defeat it politically and do it swiftly, your children and grandchildren could be engaged in a religious and ideological bloody war, the likes of which has never been seen on American soil.

Islam is a theocratic political terrorist regime that hides behind the mask of religion to accomplish its mission of a worldwide caliphate. What most Americans don’t understand is that it is a totalitarian “theo-political” belief system and a social doctrine (the two go hand in hand) based on the Quran, Sirah and Hadith, what Dr. Bill Warner of the Center for the Study of Political Islam aptly coins the “Trilogy of Islam.” It has mandates on every single aspect of life and those mandates are enforced and regulated by the barbaric criminal and civil code known as Sharia Law.

The precise definition of a Muslim becomes crystal clear when you read the trilogy of Islam. Bottom line: you are to be an Allah fearing, Quran believing and Mohammed following zealot that forces people to submit, convert, and comply with Islam and Sharia or be killed. Those are the facts. Does every Muslim follow the commands of the Quran? No, thank God. But as they assimilate themselves into communities and increase in numbers, they become more militant and less tolerant of that community’s laws and regulations.

Any religion whose “holy book” commands its followers to commit crimes that are antithetical to the laws of this country should not only lose its tax exempt status, but lose its 1st Amendment protection and be banned from the United States altogether. In case you are not familiar with some of the condoned atrocities of Islam and Sharia law . . . are you aware that women are stoned to death for committing adultery and that gay men are actually hung? Or that the genitals of little girls are mutilated in order to protect her virginity and that children may be murdered in the name of family honor?

Islam does not recognize separation of church and state. Islamic republics are dominated by spiritual leaders who oversee the strict adherence to Sharia law by its citizens. In countries where Islamic enclaves and ghettos have emerged like in France, Britain and North African countries, local mullahs enforce Sharia law regardless of its conflict with national or state laws.

What most Americans fail to understand is that Sharia law is the foundation of Islamic theocracy and totalitarianism. The establishment of global Sharia law is their ultimate goal. The Quran is unequivocal in its directive to Muslims to establish a global Islamic state (Caliphate) over which the Islamic messiah, or Mahdi, will rule with Sharia as the only law of the land. Make no mistake, that is the intent of influential Islamic elements in America. The problem is, too few Americans are aware of it and organizations like CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood are taking full advantage of our naivety. Moreover, Islam stands in stark contrast to the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution and what the First Amendment was designed to protect—our God-given unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Understand that Sharia is very complex and it’s derived from multiple Islamic sources. The Quran, considered the “uncreated word of Allah” is the primary source of Sharia law. The Hadith (sayings and actions of Muhammad) is the second most important document in Sharia. Historic rulings by jurists over the years and so-called reasoning by analogy make up the other two, less-influential sources of Sharia. Together they constitute Islam’s theological core and they result in a totalitarian way of life for Muslim followers and non-Muslims (kafirs and infidels).

Sharia law is in complete contradiction with American values because it enslaves people and encourages acts of violence and barbaric behavior. Sharia demands the death of those who renounce Islam. A former Muslim turned Christian pastor in Iran recently received a death sentence. Honor killings, marital rape, female genital mutilation, not to mention the severing of hands and feet are but a few of the other components of Sharia.

When Muslim men are directed to beat their wives for rejecting sexual advances, it’s obvious that American values are in direct conflict with what Islamic law requires of its followers.

I believe in the 1st Amendment right of people to worship or not worship whomever or whatever they want, but Islam hardly constitutes a religion. What “religion” would condone atrocities that are antithetical to the God-given unalienable rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution? None. Therefore, it does not deserve religious 1st Amendment Constitutional protection.

The following are a sample of straight forward and unambiguous verses in the Quran that clearly show the evil and violence that, unlike in Judaism and Christianity, is mandated in route to establishing a worldwide Islamic caliphate. Several verses are further clarified in bold by academic expository commentary . . .

 

Islam – Clearly and Concisely Evil and Violent.

The Quran:

Quran (2:191-193) –

“And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]… but if desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah.”

There is a good case to be made that the textual context of this particular passage is defensive war, even if the historical context was not. However, there are also two worrisome pieces to this verse. The first is that the killing of others is authorized in the event of “persecution” (a qualification that is ambiguous at best). The second is that fighting may persist until “religion is for Allah.” The example set by Muhammad is not reassuring.

Quran (2:244) –

“Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things.”

Quran (2:216) –

“Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.”

Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding caravans with this verse.

Quran (3:56) –

“As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”

Quran (3:151) –

“Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”.

This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be ‘joining companions to Allah’).

Quran (4:74) –

“Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.”

The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle, as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. Here is the theological basis for today’s suicide bombers.

Quran (4:76) –

“Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah . . .”

Quran (4:89) –

“They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”

Quran (4:95) –

“Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-”

This passage criticizes “peaceful” Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah’s eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that “Jihad” doesn’t mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is the Arabic word used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man’s protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad and this is reflected in other translations of the verse).

Quran (4:104) –

“And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain…” Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

Quran (5:33) –

“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”

Quran (8:12) –

“I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”

No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

Quran (8:15) –

“O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey’s end.”

Quran (8:39) –

“And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah”

From the historical context we know that the “persecution” spoken of here was simply the refusal by the Meccans to allow Muhammad to enter their city and perform the Haj. Other Muslims were able to travel there, just not as an armed group, since Muhammad declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad’s intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until “religion is only for Allah.” According to Ibn Ishaq (324), Muhammad justified the violence further by explaining that “Allah must have no rivals.”

Quran (8:57) –

“If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.”

Quran (8:59-60) –

“And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah’s Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy.”

Quran (8:65) –

“O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight . . .”

Quran (9:5) –

“So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.”

According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam. Prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religions Five Pillars.

Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, most of the verses of violence in the Quran are open-ended, meaning that the historical context is not embedded within the surrounding text. They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subjective as anything else in the Quran. They are in the area of the Quran that is equivalent to the New Testament of the Bible.

Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed. This proclivity toward violence (and Muhammad’s own martial legacy) has left a trail of blood and tears across world history.

This is what makes the verses of violence so dangerous. They are given the weight of “Divine Command.” While Muslim terrorists take them as literally as anything else in the Quran and understand that Islam is incomplete without Jihad, moderates offer little to contradict them—outside of opinion. Indeed, what do they have? Speaking of peace and love may win over the ignorant, but when every twelfth verse of Islam’s holiest book either speaks to Allah’s hatred for non-Muslims or calls for their death, forced conversion, or subjugation, it’s little wonder that sympathy for terrorism runs as deeply as it does in the broader community—even if most Muslims personally prefer not to interpret their religion in this way.

In fact, many Muslims are simply unaware of the Quran’s near absence of verses that preach universal non-violence. This is because their understanding of Islam comes from what they are taught by others. In the West, it is typical for Muslims to come to believe that their religion must be like Christianity—preaching the New Testament virtues of peace, love, and tolerance—because Muslims are taught that Islam is supposed to be superior in every way. They are somewhat surprised and embarrassed to learn that the evidence of the Quran and the bloody history of Islam are very much in contradiction to this . . .

Quran (9:14) –

“Fight them, Allah will punish them by your hands and bring them to disgrace . . . ”

Quran (9:20) –

“Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah’s way are of much greater worth in Allah’s sight. These are they who are triumphant.”

The “striving” spoken of here is Jihad.

Quran (9:29) –

“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”

“People of the Book” refers to Christians and Jews. This was one of the final “revelations” from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion in which Muhammad’s companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in just the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.

Quran (9:30) –

“And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!”

Quran (9:38-39) –

“O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place.”

This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.

Quran (9:41) –

“Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew.” See also the verse that follows (9:42) – “If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them”

This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).

Quran (9:73) –

“O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.”

Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that they are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today’s devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

Quran (9:88) –

“But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper.”

Quran (9:111) –

“Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.”

Quran (9:123) –

“O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness.”

Quran (18:65-81) –

This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story, which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source, tells of Moses encountering a man with “special knowledge” who does things which don’t seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would “grieve” his parents by “disobedience and ingratitude.” He was killed so that Allah could provide them a ‘better’ son.

Quran (21:44) –

“We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?”

Quran (25:52) –

“Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness . . .”

“Strive against” is Jihad—obviously not in the personal context. It’s also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.

Quran (33:60-62) –

“If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter.”

This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered “merciless” and “horrible murder” in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to “fight in the way of Allah” (3:167) and hence don’t act as Muslims should), those with “diseased hearts” (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and “alarmists” or “agitators” who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad’s biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today’s terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah’s eternal word to Muslim generations.

Quran (47:3-4) –

“Those who reject Allah follow vanities, while those who believe follow the truth from their lord. Thus does Allah set forth form men their lessons by similtudes. Therefore when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make (them) prisoners,” Those who reject Allah are to be subdued in battle. The verse goes on to say the only reason Allah doesn’t do the dirty work himself is in order to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test. “But if it had been Allah’s Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in the Way of Allah,- He will never let their deeds be lost.”

Quran (47:35) –

“Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: “have the upper hand”) for Allah is with you.”

This very important verse asserts that the Religion of Peace is not to grant peace to the broader society until Islamic rule has been established.

Quran (48:17) –

“There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom.”


Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means ‘spiritual struggle.’ If so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted?

Quran (48:29) –

“Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves”

Islam is not about treating everyone equally. There are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status.

Quran (61:4) –

“Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way” Religion of Peace, indeed! This is followed by (61:9): “He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist.”

Quran (61:10-12) –

“O ye who believe! Shall I lead you to a bargain that will save you from a grievous Penalty?- That ye believe in Allah and His Messenger, and that ye strive (your utmost) in the Cause of Allah, with your property and your persons: That will be best for you, if ye but knew! He will forgive you your sins, and admit you to Gardens beneath which Rivers flow, and to beautiful mansions in Gardens of Eternity.”

This verse was given in battle. It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.

Quran (66:9) –

“O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey’s end.”

The root word of “Jihad” is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include “hypocrites” —those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.

From the Hadith:

Bukhari (52:177) –

Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”

Bukhari (52:256) –

The Prophet… was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, “They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans).”

In this command, Muhammad establishes that it is permissible to kill non-combatants in the process of killing a perceived enemy. This provides justification for the many Islamic terror bombings.

Bukhari (52:220) –

Allah’s Apostle said… ‘I have been made victorious with terror’

Abu Dawud (14:2526) –

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)

Abu Dawud (14:2527) –

The Prophet said: “Striving in the path of Allah (jihad) is incumbent on you along with every ruler, whether he is pious or impious.”

Muslim (1:33) –

The Messenger of Allah said: “I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.”

Bukhari (8:387) –

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah”

Muslim (1:149) –

“Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause . . . ”

Muslim (20:4645) –

“. . . He (the Messenger of Allah) did that and said:
“There is another act which elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa’id) said: What is that act? He replied: Jihad in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!”

Muslim (20:4696) –

“The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said:
‘One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihid died the death of a hypocrite.”

Muslim (19:4321-4323) –

Three separate hadith in which Muhammad shrugs over the news that innocent children were killed in a raid by his men against unbelievers. His response:
“They are of them (meaning the enemy).”

Tabari 7:97 -

The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared,
“Kill any Jew who falls under your power.”

Ashraf was a poet, killed by Muhammad’s men because he insulted Islam. Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill. An innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim partner, merely for being non-Muslim.

Tabari 9:69 -

“Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us” The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam.

Ibn Ishaq: 327 –

“Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.”

Ibn Ishaq: 990 –

Lest anyone think that cutting off someone’s head while screaming ‘Allah Akbar!’ is a modern custom, here is an account of that very practice under Muhammad, who seems to approve.

Ibn Ishaq: 992 –

“Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.”

Muhammad’s instructions to his men prior to a military raid.

In closing, not all Muslims wage Jihad. Their benevolence however, is a mark of individual moral character and knowing the difference between right and wrong—not by following Muhammad’s life example or the directives of the Quran, Sirah and Hadith. However, as we’ve witnessed in Europe, Britain and the Arab Spring in the Middle East and in many African countries, when they gain strength in numbers, they often usher in Sharia Law and usurp local laws and ordinances.

It brings to mind the words of the Son of God who walked in Palestine six hundred years before Muhammad – “Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” (Matthew 7:15)

Learn the truth about Islam / Sharia and the clear and present danger it presents to the US. Read unbiased and academic websites like Political Islam , Jihad Watch, Act for America, Atlas Shrugs, and Daniel Pipes.

End Note: Commentary on Quran provided by Dr. Bill Warner of The Center for the Study of Political Islam.

Until next time . . . Wake Up America!

Kevin A. Lehmann

Take a moment to share your thoughts about this article in the comment box below.

If you are a facebook friend and like my articles, blog posts and op-eds, due to time constraints and a rapidly growing list of readers, please subscribe to CatchKevin.com and share my blog and radio show with friends and family who value real, raw and relevant talk radio. Thank you.

Facebook comments:

comments

Trackback URL

  1. 13 Comment(s)

  2. By Nuda Waya on Jan 23, 2012 | Reply

    Thanks Kevin, a great many people are tagging those like myself as rascist because of my experience is Iraq has made me against American becoming “Islamasized”. One inescapable fact is The United States Constitution is the Law of this land, and the Sharia Law is the Law of that land but one cannot simply accept Sharia Law with the Constitution as they are mutually exclusive to one another. One point I always ask those who disgree is: “What other immigrant nationality have we ever accepted the “Laws” of their former country?” None, there is no precident, so why are Islamist so important/special compared to Hispanic, Irish, African, ect. or laws of pre-existing cultures like mine Native American? They aren’t, anyone telling you elsewise has an agenda. They can have their faith, fine but they should not be allowed to enforce any of their Sharia Law here in our Constitutional based legal system. One aspect being non-Muslims cannot testify against Muslims. Yeah, that won’t work for me. Here is my thinking: Don’t like this country’s laws? You know where the border is, welcome to America! I heard rumors the Aussies are working on putting a stop to it too.

  3. By Lois E, Winters on Jan 23, 2012 | Reply

    You know Kevin, if Newt Gingrich become president, he will be after Congress to outlaw Sharia Law in the United States. He also will insist that English become the official language. I feel he is a fearless leader and this is what we need without a doubt. Certainly not an appeaser again. It will be a tough battle, but I am with him as long as I can draw a breath.

  4. By Dont Ask on Jan 24, 2012 | Reply

    Where would rightwingnuts be without their Bogeymen…?

  5. By Kevin A. Lehmann on Jan 24, 2012 | Reply

    Actually, I’m about par.

  6. By Margaret on Jan 25, 2012 | Reply

    I still fail to see how it can be considered ‘racist’ to be against a religion!!! The ones I have attempted to talk to just scream obscenitiies, call me a racist, an inbred whore…and they torture and mutilate women because a book was written about some perv that somebody else claimed was holy. Um, if they keep on defacing and destroying Allah’s property (chidlren) then I hope He will show up and treat them in kind!!

  7. By A.J. Forester on Feb 16, 2012 | Reply

    Hi Kevin,
    Thank you for this article. It is great to have this available as a resource. We are in trouble. Did you hear that YouTube deleted David Wood’s rebuttal of ABC’s inaccurate report about Islam? We are being censored out of the marketplace. We need to fight hard now before it is too late.

  8. By Melanie on Feb 21, 2012 | Reply

    Thank you Kevin! Americans need to know more about this mindset.Yes, we are now a multi-cultural country & have acquired much tolerance. Tolerance & stupidity are not the same thing. Wer need to be aware that this people do not separate church & state & that the mindset is NOT one of peace & tolerance our even good will.They hate & are to hate anyone who is not of their mindset.Today, because American soldiers were trying to prevent Islam terrorists from sending messages on old Korans, they wee pit into an incinerator..a clean fire, not out in the open. Some workers found out & instead of going to someone in charge & trying to stop the fires, they started a riot! This is in their own country over old books with pages missing! These are not peaceful or peace loving people.They wil be just as likely to kill Islamic people who will not join them as any one else

  9. By James Synot on Mar 29, 2012 | Reply

    al
    lah
    scourge
    Evil

  10. By Jesse Heinsohn on May 31, 2012 | Reply

    This is very serious. My fiance and I were just talking about this matter. These Islam people must be stopped from getting into the supreme court OMG. God forbid they get their way, this wonderful country will be doomed. I don’t know why these Islam Muslims people think they can come to these country and start telling us american citizens how to live and what to do. We don’t go to their country and tell them to start living the american way and impose on them. I agree.. if they don’t like our laws and abide., then they should go back to their country. With all the imperfections of these country. It’s still the best country IN THE WORLD!!!! And if someone thinks., these words are not true., than what the hek are they doing here in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA..

  11. By Richard Dawson on May 31, 2012 | Reply

    Well written piece Kevin, however the salient point? The total woeful ignorance of the 80%. Unfortunately you are preaching to the choir and the choir was long ago lulled to sleep by their collective television sets. Go to Walmart and I will bet you one Islamic gold Dinar most folks don’t know who our Vice President is.
    Semper Fi

  12. By Deltarose on Sep 13, 2012 | Reply

    And if we let THEM take our guns as they are trying feverishly to do, we will really be at their mercy and they know it!

  13. By Deltarose on Sep 13, 2012 | Reply

    This planet is under Satan’s sway right now but, these Muslims will find out who the one true God is in the end! There won’t be any virgins for them, it’ll be hell fire!

  14. By Ravi Ranjan Singh on Sep 14, 2012 | Reply

    I Slam
    West must realize JIHAD IS A WAR, EVER-GOING; NOT AGAINST WEST, OR ONLY WEST.

    It is as much against East, if not more.

    Unfortunately, Jihad got attention of West only after, the heat reached the West. On other hand The East, especially Bharat that is India, bore the burnt for centuries.
    Dear Westerners please understand this clearly Jihad is not at against West, it is as much against East, in fact against humanity.

    Now human race has to fight it out, jointly.

    You need to know, how Jihadis overran India. How and why Sikhism was formed? Why & how were Sikhs tortured to death for not accepting Islam? Why Jihadis still consider Sikhs as enemy no.1 and Potential Danger/Death? To Stop Jihad, west should do what Sikhs did Centuries back, and remember that time Sikhs were outnumbered, out of power, had no Nation or State, they were on run, individual properties confiscated, having Price and Prize for their Head. Still, how handful of Sikhs overthrew Mughals the Mighty? Chased Jihadis right up to their burrows in Afghanistan, took over Kabul, Kandhar, Jalalbad, made them sign ‘Document of Repentance and Apology’ for their, and their forefathers deeds.
    Sikhs made Afghans wear Salwar Kamiz the dress of women (who were seen as lowly creatures/slave by Jihadis of that time and their thinking has not changed) and was against their tenet, considered as humiliation to great warriors. Why jihadists/Afghans were forced for wearing women dress is interesting. The Pathans mercenaries tried to escape disguised themselves as women by putting on Burqua and Salwar Kamiz under it. As the Sikh commander-in-chief Hari Singh Nalwa ordered his men ‘no rape, no molestation, no harm to women or children’. Too hoodwink Sikhs Jihadi men tried to feign and dodge as women, but Jihadis made comical fool of them as they were netted in their cowardly act. Like Head of Red Mosque did in Lahore couple of years back. Sikh C-in-C Nalwa gave them choice either to fight like a man, or to declare them self unmanly to avail concessions offer for women. But these concessions had a condition that this concession is valid only to those who dress like women. Afghans had to digest it, irony is, it latter it became part of their life, and now it is their ‘National Dress’. Arabs still taunt Afghans as women/unmanly, homos and Kafir on Salwar issue.
    Now what were military and other strategies and strength of the Sikhs? Besides what can we learn from Sikh history? Imagine how deadly the impact of Islamic Rulers was on India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh; that a new religion/Panth came into being as retaliation. Sikhs suffered but never surrendered, again six decades back Bharat was tragically partitioned. Partition of India is a tragedy. But the greater tragedy is, it was not partitioned as Muslim India and Hindu India or Muslim India and Non-Muslim India, but as Exclusive Muslim India that is now Pakistan and Shared Secular India. In other words Muslims got one Muslim Monopoly or Darul-Islam Country Pakistan and other Bharat (India) where they are again equal Partners. Hindus, Sikhs, Christians & Buddhists got one country to be shared amongst themselves and Muslims as equal Partners. It was Victory of Jihad; that went unnoticed. And the Greatest Tragedy is that it was projected as win-win situation for both Muslims and non-Muslims, also by Gandhi and his sponsors, former Colonial Masters ‘The British’.
    Assume say after 50 years there are riots in US and it is decided that half of US is Islamic and other half is common, and termed this as Win-Win Justice to Islamists and Christian, Jews, aboriginals. Busy in celebrating or reconciling WW 2nd the west could not realize unique Jihad that has taken Place.
    An Independence that has been tricked into, at cost of Millions of life, transfer of 10s of Millions of citizens on basis of religion(in a very shrewd manner favoring Jihadis) and seeds of another Jihad/Partition left in Secular India(veiled in grab of Liberal/left Hindu culture/Secularism).

    It was Win-Win Situation in fact, but for Jihadis the new Rulers of Pakistan and their (natural Partners) Establishment of Secular India. Jihadis got a full-fledged Nation State Pakistan and another Nation State called India in which they became Equal Partners. India’s new and incompetent leaders also felt relieved and hence winners because (a) got rid of their competitors in power, especially Mr. Jinnah who could outsmart Indian incompetent, British bred Leaders of slashed India. The ringleader of these incompetent, imposed and bogus leaders wanted himself to be written as apostle of Love in history and he succeeded in it. He fooled the world that time and the world is still fooling itself by believing that agent, powerbroker, Jihad-Sympathizer and veiled Jihadi as SAINT. He was probably also aspiring for Noble Prize, his coconspirators’ new generation who are in still in absolute power in India are still trying get Noble Prize for him posthumously. As expected in six decades, population of Non-Muslims that was more than 20% in Pakistan diminished to less than 3%. The reason is Jihad, Convincing the gullible, concession/ indulgence to willing, terrorizing the sensible, forcing upon challenger the killing the defiant. Population of Bangladesh a State that had latter fallen apart from Pakistan, had more than 35% Hindu Population, now has less than 7% Hindus. Whereas Muslim Population of Bharat (India) that was <10% after Partition, is now anything between 15 to 25%. The Game of Demography Jihad, lost by Bharat (India) and followers of Indigenous Dharam/Panths (Religions) and other foreign originated Religions as Christians (of course now these religion are as much part of India as Indigenous Religions/Panths) against followers of Doctrine of Death. Furthermore, Zoroastrianism is condemned in its country of origin, Iran and is respected in Bharat. Taking advantage of its religious tolerance, the gesture was and is exploited by Jihadis.
    Off course some Christians Missionaries are also doing the analogous acts, but its overzealousness of some Christian denominations, Churches and individuals behind it. However, Holy Bible cannot be held responsible for acts of these Missionaries. No Christian Governments are budgeting the conversion racket actively or remotely promoting it. The damage done by these Missionaries to Indigenous Dharma/Religion are:
    1. The converts are uprooted from their roots, cut of from their folks and there is mistrust between neo-converts and parental community.
    2. They identify themselves with alien faith, that they hardly understand but they are alienated from motherland. These neo-Converts in turn convert more aboriginals, Tribals, poor, disadvantageous victims. They use every method from 'planted miracles' to glorifying false stories about Jesus to draw analogies with Hindu Gods. Animal, fallible gods of primitive, lowly, colonized Hindu Race. I Pity on these neo-converts.
    3. Once the neo-converts are anti-Hindu, they identify Jihadis as a lesser enemy or even friends or as discriminated cousins.
    4. The neo-convert in turn are extremely dedicated, carried away, sometimes because of own reasons and most of the time to prove their loyalty to their White/brown Masters. New converts they keep inventing Christianity and have created an Indianized Pagan-Christianity thus are corrupting Christianity.
    5. So the false Christianity is doing harm to soul of Christianity and the genuine peace loving Missionaries also get maligned are looked as mischief monger by Proud others so the harmony is disturbed.
    6. Much of Christian and Hindu force is spent contending each other, like Jews and Christians or Catholic and Protestants often do. This dilutes their energy to fight Universal Evil the Jihad.
    Back to History:
    The slaughter on Bharat (India) started much before that of West, Right from 714 AD. Though 'Test Fire' Skirmish took place decades before major onslaught. Now how did Bharat Survive, and is still going strong is a study case for West. The struggle of the Hindus to resist the Jihadi aggression into India was spread over a period of 600 years from 715 AD. Up to 1328 Ad. This contrasts with the swift Muslim victories in Persia (Iran) over the Zoroastrian Sassanians and in Mesopotamia, Egypt and North Africa over the Romans (Byzantines). The Muslims could not subjugate India with ease. And even after subjugating different parts of the country, they were never able to rule it entirely. The next 400 years from 1328 up to 1720 was marked by a valiant and ceaseless struggle for independence by Hindus to deliver India from Muslim tyranny. The Hardest hit was blown to Jihadis by Sikhs, when Muslim power was at peak. When they were a superpower and believed to be invincible. Rajputs and Gujjars opposed them first as they were attacked first. Latter Jats opposed them, Tribals and almost every community opposed them in India. But the role of Sikhs is a special study case and source of inspiration.
    As Sikhs did not just fought Jihadis for themselves and by themselves only, they were especially created, to end the tyrant. The Sikhism Started with Guru Nanak, He opposed the mighty aggressor Babur single handedly. He called him 'Jabbar 'meaning tyrant/cruel right at his face. Later Guru Arjun Dev was tortured to death for not accepting Islam. The story of Last Sikh Guru Govind Singh begins as Aurangzeb the Emperor was most intolerant Sunni Jihadi for him Sufis and Shias were also infidels. Enjoying intoxication of his power, he was killing Hindus on refusal to convert to Islam. Kashmir being the Centre of learning and Land of learned (Brahmans) was his special area of interest as he believed converting intellectuals is more useful and easy. Disappointed, helpless Brahmins of Kashmir met Guru Teg Bhadur father of Last Guru with a hope. After discussions with them Guru Teg Bhadur sent a message to Aurangzeb that "all Hindus especially Kashmir Brahmins will embrace Islam willingly, provided you convince me and convert me". This was a heartening development for Aurangzeb. By just converting one man he will get paradise, 72 Virgins. Guru visited Delhi; he was made to converse with Quazi. Kazi said Idol worshiping and ringing of bells to please God is a sin. Muslims don't do it, and we must finish these idol worshipers. Guru said I don't worship Idols nor believe in bells and I am against this ritual. Kazi asked why you are siding with them, if it is so. Guru said I don't have right to kill someone if does not believes in what I believe. I am for freedom first. Not being able to convince Guru , his companions were brutally tortured before him to terrorize him. But he did not budge an inch. Finally Guru Teg Bhadur was also put to Death.
    This was the turning point in the history. After beheading him Kazi announced ‘in this land of Kafirs anyone who calls himself a Hindu, may come forward and pick your Kafir Guru's head’. There was crowd of thousands and most of them were Hindus. But no one dare to come forward. That was assumed & declared end of Hinduism. Incidentally, there was a dust storm, taking advantage of it one man cleverly managed to smuggle out his head. He took his head straight to Punjab after traveling for nearly three days. He narrated the whole story to Guru Teg Bhadur's son and the next and last Sikh Guru. "No one could dare to affirm himself Hindu though they were thousands of them". Son of Beheaded Guru and the last Guru of Sikhs Guru Govind Singh said 'If Hindus cannot dare say publicly that they are Hindus that really means Hinduism has now ceased to exist. Private, in house rituals done secretly are not going to last long. One must have courage to affirm his or her faith openly otherwise let's disown our respective faiths. Timid should be turned into Soldier'. So Guru Govind Singh gave Sikhs a sign, bearing which, he cannot shy away from the fact that he is a follower of his faith. And that sign is his "Hair'; a turncoat cannot be a Sikh. If you are a Sikh, you are a thorough Sikh, Sikh inside and Sikh outside. No scope escapism. Your enemy knows you, be ready to face it; otherwise you don't be a Sikh rather you can't be. That is it.
    This boldness and direct challenge is the only answer to Jihad, to radicals, to oppressor, to mad lunatics.
    No double-mindedness, I am what I am. I am here to save humanity, old or young, sturdy or fragile but I am bold and strong; I am a Sikh. Sikh Slogans and addressing forms are 'Chardikala' meaning 'in high spirits'. Sikhs chant it even when injured or dying or even as captivity. 'Sat Sri Akal' meaning Truth shall prevail. 'Raj Karega Khalsa, aaki rahe na koy' Pure shall rule (not oppressors with worldly power) and there is no impediment in that.
    Now whole Human race needs same firmness and zero tolerance against Jihadis. Guru TegBhadur did not die for his faith; he was not an Idol worshiper: he died for others faith and his principal and that is 'not to oppress and not to be oppressed'.

    Know Sikhs, Support Sikhs, adopt their strategies. Many opportunist Hindus also sided with Jihadis against Sikhs. As nowadays many opportunist Westerners are supporting Jihadis. The Jihadi Propaganda was so strong that at one time of time even Hindus started feeling that Sikhs are to inhuman to Jihadis, without realizing Human Rights for Right Humans only. Recently Hindus started feeling Sikhs are no more their well-wishers and some Sikhs also started distancing them self from their Hindu brothers. But in fact the bond between two communities is so strong that nothing can separate them. So Sikhs just did not fight Jihadis, just for themselves but for Human Race. Sikhs realized the time bomb has not to be just neutralized, but diffused and dismantled and destroyed. Sikhs also did not fight just by themselves. From the very beginning they were extrovert, developing new relations and maintaining old ones, seeking new techniques, seeking and providing help from and to everyone who can defeat Jihadis. Here continuing the Sikh Tradition I appeal to Whole Human Race to unite against Jihadis.

    On 11September1897 little fortress of Saragarhi that was in fact just a signal tower was besieged by 10, 000 Afghan Jihadis. 21 Sikhs posted there were not prepared for battle; they were there just to pass signals between two forts by flag waving, fireworks etc. They were asked to barter their life by betraying their army and send wrong signals. There reply was they have already pledged their life to loyalty and God. On 12th September attempt to take over began. On 15th the fortress fell in hands of Jihadis only after last man was killed, four thousands of Jihadis were killed and almost every raider was wounded.
    Pleasing, Surrendering, U-turns, Image building, fallout, politically correct is words which are going to make modern States enslaved Nations. One question some people ask me is, are Sikhs Hindus?
    No, they are not. I counter question them, is Butter Milk answer is here. Butter is no milk but enhanced milk, but it is not milk. Yes, butter is milk because it originates from milk. Butter is not possible without milk. Why I am writing it to Christian West, You need Sikh (type)-Christians to be raised to counter onslaught of anti-human evil cult.

Post a Comment

4) Insert the following HTML code just before your closing tag of your website. Again, remember to change the URL to your own: